ДСТУ CEN/TR 16705:2014
Скачать документ
Формат .docx · доступно зарегистрированным пользователям
en: Perimeter protection - Performance classification methodology uk:
ICS 13.310
English Version
Perimeter protection - Performance classification methodology
This Technical Report was approved by CEN on 25 March 2014. It has been drawn up by the Technical Committee CEN/TC 388.
CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and United Kingdom.
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Avenue Marnix 17, B-1000 Brussels
Contents Page
Foreword 5
0 Introduction 6
0.1 Purpose 6
0.2 Approach 6
0.3 Vital infrastructure 6
1 Scope 7
2 Normative references 7
3 Terms and definitions 7
4 Performance classification methodology 15
4.1 Outline of the approach 15
4.2 Determining the required the level of protection - picture of the methodology 16
4.3 Assumptions and starting point making the calculation model 18
4.4 The questionnaire of the calculation the model 20
4.4.1 Introduction to the questionnaire 20
4.4.2 Text of the questionnaire annex data entry sheet 21
5 Modus operandi 24
5.1 Introduction 24
5.2 Aggressor types 24
5.3 Scenarios 25
5.4 Toolsets 25
6 Risk assessment methodology 25
6.1 General 25
6.2 Risk - Target identification 26
6.3 Threats 26
6.4 Site characterization 26
6.4.1 General 26
6.4.2 Site and physical environment 26
6.4.3 Human and social factors of the environment 27
6.4.4 Use of the site 27
6.4.5 Type of access 27
7 Level of protection 27
8 Determining functional requirements 28
8.1 Introduction 28
8.2 Questions for establishing the functional requirement 28
9 Elements of possible solutions 29
9.1 Introduction 29
9.2 Elements of delay 29
9.2.1 Overview of elements of delay 29
9.2.2 Fences 30
9.2.3 Walls 31
9.2.4 Barriers 32
9.2.5 Gates 32
9.2.6 Roadblockers, Bollards 32
9.3 Elements of detection 32
9.3.1 Introduction 32
9.3.2 Overview of elements of detection 32
9.3.3 Detection 33
9.3.4 Exterior sensors PI DS 33
9.3.5 Lighting 33
9.3.6 Entry/exit control 33
9.4 External elements 34
9.5 Local law and regulations 34
10 Inventories 34
11 On testing 35
Annex A Security system operational requirements - Q and A 36
Annex В? Framework for perimeter protection systems evaluation 39
Annex C An environmental and organizational checklist for perimeter protection 41
C.1 Introduction 41
C.2 Environmental checklist for perimeter protection 41
C.3 Organizational checklist for perimeter protection 45
Annex D A perimeter security technologies classification 49
D.1 Introduction 49
D.2 Four families for intrusion detection 49
D.2.1 Structure of the annex 49
D.2.2 Structure of the four main Tables D.3 to D.6 50
D.3 Stand-alone equipment 54
D.4 Fence-mounted sensors 58
D.5 Active Physical security 59
D.6 Underground sensors 62
Annex E Inventory of perimeter intruder detection systems (PIDs) 64
E.1 Introduction 64
E.2 Combination of two sensors 65
Annex F Matrix of current systems and (generic type) products 71
Annex G On Perimeter surveillance and burglary resistance 86
G.1 Introduction 86
G.2 Use of detection systems for perimeter protection 86
G.2.1 Basic requirements for perimeter surveillance systems 86
G.2.2 Basic principles of the detection systems 88
G.2.3 Comparison of detection systems 89
G.2.4 Summary 89
G.3 Classification for burglary resistance 90
G.3.1 Recommendations for the assessment of the resistance class 90
G.3.2 DIN-Standards for burglar resistance 91
Annex H Pictures offences, gates and entrance barriers 92
H.1 Introduction 92
H.2 Different sorts of fences 92
H.2.1 Vegetable fences 92
H.2.2 Wood palisade 93
H.2.3 Walls 94
H.2.4 Metallic fences 96
H.2.5 Combinations of systems 99
H.3 Supplementary accessories 100
H.3.1 Razor wire 100
H.3.2 Sharp pins 100
H.4 Gates and entrance barriers 101
H.4.1 Gates 101
H .4.2 Road obstacles 102
Annex I CEN Workshop Agreement CWA 16221 104
1.1
I.2
I.3 Introduction 104
Scope of CWA 16221:2010 104
Table of Content of CWA 16221:2010 105Bibliography 109Foreword
This document (CEN/TR 16705:2014) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 388 “Perimeter protection”, the secretariat of which is held by NEN.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent rights. CEN [and/or CENELEC] shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
The elaboration of this Technical Specification has been financially supported by the European Commission and the CIPS Programme (Grant Agreement №? HCME/2009/CIPS/FP/CEN-001). 0 Introduction
0.1 Purpose
The increasing need for customers to be able to select and purchase perimeter protection solutions that fit their needs calls for a generic and structured approach to the assessment of risks, to the identification of functional requirements, to the classification of perimeter protection solutions, including organizational measures, and to the design and test criteria for such perimeter protection solutions. This Technical Report is a step in the development of that approach.
The general goal that has been set is to make a European Standard that is applicable to a wide range of perimeter protection solutions, covering the needs for basic barriers and entrance solutions to more complex, high security solutions.
This Technical Report firstly describes the conceptual basis for further development of security performance requirements, technical specifications and test methods for use in perimeter protection systems in a European context. The report focusses on the performance classification methodology for the identification of the desired systems performance.
Secondly this Technical Report presents the results of inventories that have been made on current systems and (generic type) products that are available to the design engineer in both the public and private sector, relevant member states regulations, relevant documents from CEN, CEN/TC 325, ISO and other sources. The results are presented in annexes to this report.
This Technical Report therefore aims at providing information to be used for the design of future activities for making the 'perimeter protection standard'. It is not intended as a guidance for the actual development of perimeter protection systems. Nonetheless the information in this report may function as an aid to practitioners in their choice of appropriate measures in order to meet the diverse requirements.
0.2 Approach
Perimeter protection projects call for the interaction between suppliers of perimeter protection solutions, their customers and other relevant stakeholders. Only the proper interaction between these parties will lead to valid analyses and a certified perimeter protection solution.
A sequence of steps leading to the risk assessment, requested level of protection, functional requirements and basic selection of perimeter protection solution is proposed. The choice of the measure(s) to be taken depends upon a number of factors which include but are not restricted to: the local environment, the purpose of the measure(s), type property to be protected and environmental and organizational factors.
Perimeter protection systems or components may be used independently such as a perimeter fence or in combination with other measures in order to provide a more holistic solution such as a fence and gate. This approach may be extended to include Closed-Circuit TV systems (CCTV) and Perimeter Intruder Devices (PID).
To determine the risk involved for a site requiring perimeter protection is, for the most part, comparable to the analysis required for any given asset. Therefore this Technical Report builds on the work done for risk analysis by CEN/TC 325 'Crime prevention through building, facility and area design'.
0.3 Vital infrastructure
It is recognized that with regard to vital infrastructure and very high risk objects, the generic approach indicated in this Technical Report may not suffice and additional checklists and risk assessment tools may be required. There will be particular threats and modus operand! that should be considered when assessing vital infrastructure and very high risk objects that are outside the scope of this TR. For this reference can be made to documents from national authorities, etc.
1 Scope
This Technical Report aims at providing information to be used for the design of the future activities for making a 'perimeter protection standard'.
This CEN Technical Report describes a performance classification methodology for the identification of the desired systems performance for perimeter protection systems. It also gives a conceptual framework for matching the desired performance and the capabilities of a possible solution.
Furthermore this CEN Technical Report presents the results of inventories that have been made on current systems and (generic type) products, relevant member states regulations, relevant documents from CEN, CEN/TC 325, ISO and other sources. It should be noted that these inventories cannot be considered complete and any values given should be considered indicative values.
The following subjects are not covered by this Technical Report:
threats approaching from the sea side;
threats approaching through the air.
It is recognized that with regard to vital infrastructure and very high risk objects the generic system approach indicated in this Technical Report may not suffice and additional checklists and risk assessment tools may be required.
2 Normative references
Not applicable.
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this docum
